| From: | Sutou Kouhei <kou(at)clear-code(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | tomas(at)vondra(dot)me, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations |
| Date: | 2026-03-27 01:36:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20260327.103640.1195140797832123502.kou@clear-code.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
In <CAD21AoCLxUhQ0uBjDKXvCEtJBCfF13Ru_7u-Qrrsu+0PPUqcPQ(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
"Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations" on Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:43:07 -0800,
Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Looking at these results, it seems that 0001-from-binary cases and
> 0006-to-binary cases are slower throughout the six results?
Good point. I didn't notice them. But I feel that it's not
related to the patch set. Because 0001 doesn't change COPY
FROM related code. 0001 just changes COPY TO related
code. And 0006 just adds tests. 0006 doesn't change
implementations.
BTW, how to proceed this proposal? It seems that we can't
proceed this proposal without PostgreSQL committers'
attentions but it seems that it's difficult.
Thanks,
--
kou
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lukas Fittl | 2026-03-27 01:50:20 | Re: Refactor query normalization into core query jumbling |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2026-03-27 01:36:14 | Re: Skipping schema changes in publication |