Re: Incremental View Maintenance, take 2

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Alexandre Felipe <o(dot)alexandre(dot)felipe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: Incremental View Maintenance, take 2
Date: 2026-02-21 13:49:58
Message-ID: 202602211347.b7tr67j4c7dw@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2026-Feb-13, Alexandre Felipe wrote:

> Hi Andreas,
>
> I tried resending, multiple times. I tried the last change, the first
> message, the message with the last patches, and a few others.

Yeah, it's not really guaranteed to work -- I think it would especially
fail to work if the original message comes from a domain that's strict
about its DMARC configuration; though there may be other issues as well.

I think we need to rewrite that feature somehow. For instance, maybe we
can send the message (or the thread) as an attachment in a new email,
rather than delivering the original as is.

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcos Pegoraro 2026-02-21 14:10:18 Partial Mode in Aggregate Functions
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2026-02-21 13:45:31 Re: BUG #19393: pg_upgrade fails with duplicate key violation when CHECK constraint named *_not_null exists