Re: Improve monitoring of shared memory allocations

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve monitoring of shared memory allocations
Date: 2026-02-09 18:32:23
Message-ID: 202602091830.zbshylac5tvi@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

On 2025-Apr-04, Rahila Syed wrote:

> Please find attached the patch which removes the changes for
> non-shared hash tables and keeps them for shared hash tables.
>
> I tested this by running make-check, make-check world and the reproducer
> script shared by David. I also ran pgbench to test creation and
> expansion of some of the shared hash tables.

Was this forgotten, superseded, abandoned, or should it still be under
consideration?
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5620/

Thanks,

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 陈宗志 2026-02-09 18:52:58 [PROPOSAL] Doublewrite Buffer as an alternative torn page protection to Full Page Write
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2026-02-09 18:23:52 Re: Remove HeapTupleheaderSetXmin{Committed,Invalid} functions