Re: [V2] Adding new CRC32C implementation for IBM S390X

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: eddy(at)linux(dot)ibm(dot)com, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "brueckner(at)linux(dot)ibm(dot)com" <brueckner(at)linux(dot)ibm(dot)com>, "iii(at)linux(dot)ibm(dot)com" <iii(at)linux(dot)ibm(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [V2] Adding new CRC32C implementation for IBM S390X
Date: 2026-02-04 10:04:16
Message-ID: 202602041002.ynbujqkxwua4@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Jul-17, John Naylor wrote:

> Great, thanks! I took this (v4, for the archives) for a spin on one of
> the LinuxONE instances in the buildfarm. Since godbolt.org doesn't
> have clang for s390x, I tested on a machine with clang 18. With that,
> I found that the configure check successfully compiles and links
> broken code. :-( This is different from gcc 14 which "harmlessly"
> failed to compile (until 14.3 fixed that). So, it seems for the clang
> versions that are broken we actually do need to guard within the test
> programs after all. Eduard, which compiler versions have you tested
> the patch on?

Did anybody want to update this patch? Seems sad to have progressed
this much and abandon it at the last minute.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5779/

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Cómo ponemos nuestros dedos en la arcilla del otro. Eso es la amistad; jugar
al alfarero y ver qué formas se pueden sacar del otro" (C. Halloway en
La Feria de las Tinieblas, R. Bradbury)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Geier 2026-02-04 10:06:50 Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?
Previous Message David Geier 2026-02-04 10:02:42 Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?