Re: Proposal: recent access based routing for primary-replica setups

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: nadav(at)tailorbrands(dot)com
Cc: pgpool-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: recent access based routing for primary-replica setups
Date: 2026-01-08 05:44:52
Message-ID: 20260108.144452.1551324238617142515.ishii@postgresql.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgpool-hackers

Than you for the review!
I will commit the patch.

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

> Much much better and cleaner! Thanks!
>
> Nadav Shatz
> Tailor Brands | CTO
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 4:19 AM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nadav,
>>
>> I have just noticed that check_replication_time_lag_with_cmd() can be
>> simplified by using StringInfo functions. Patch attached. What do you
>> think?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Tatsuo Ishii
>> SRA OSS K.K.
>> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
>> Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
>>

In response to

Browse pgpool-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nadav Shatz 2026-01-14 08:55:41 Re: Proposal: Recent mutated table tracking in memory
Previous Message Nadav Shatz 2026-01-08 04:59:45 Re: Proposal: recent access based routing for primary-replica setups