| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | nadav(at)tailorbrands(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgpool-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: recent access based routing for primary-replica setups |
| Date: | 2026-01-05 23:52:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20260106.085257.1146983017764501399.ishii@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgpool-hackers |
> Thanks for the help! please find attached the latest version with all
> changes and test passing.
Thanks for updating patch! I confirmed that all test have passed on my
Ubunu box. Now I am working on Japanese document. While working on
it, I did followings to the English document. (see attached)
- Reformat it so that each line is not too long. Like PostgreSQL, I
bend each line at most 78 chars. (I know other parts of document do
not follow the rule but I do not want to add more lines not
following the rule).
- Move replication_delay_source_cmd (string) and
replication_delay_source_timeout (integer) at the bottom of
"5.12. Streaming Replication Check" section. We usually add the new
parameters at the bottom of the page if there's no particular
reason. Previously they were in between prefer_lower_delay_standby
and log_standby_delay.
- Add following to replication_delay_source_cmd. "The line can be
terminated with or without a new line character." This is observed
from the implementation. I believe this matters for those who try to
implement replication_delay_source_cmd.
Lastly I have one question.
replication_delay_source_timeout (integer)
Specifies the timeout in seconds for the external command
specified by replication_delay_source_cmd. If the command does not
finish within the timeout, Pgpool-II logs an error and continues
using the built-in method.
It seems this ("continues using the built-in method") is different
from the actual behavior. It seems that after timeout, the external
command is tried and timeout.... Do you want to fix the source code to
match with the document? Or change (just remove ""continues using the
built-in method") the document? I am fine with changing the document.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| stream-check.sgml | text/sgml | 15.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2026-01-05 23:59:31 | Re: Proposal: recent access based routing for primary-replica setups |
| Previous Message | Nadav Shatz | 2025-12-29 09:31:12 | Re: Proposal: recent access based routing for primary-replica setups |