| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | emond(dot)papegaaij(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgpool-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Pgpool-II 4.7.0 released. |
| Date: | 2025-12-31 07:57:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20251231.165714.1023017053914495270.ishii@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgpool-general |
>> Unfortunately it's not possible to bind on all IP addresses for pgpool
>> by tweaking hostnameN. You could specify it to '*' so that it binds on
>> all IP addresses, but this will cause a different problem:
>> communicating to other watchdog is refused. This is because each
>> watchdog node name is created from hostnameN. If hostnameN is '*', the
>> node name will be something like "*:5432 Linux..." which is different
>> from what other watchdog nodes expect (they expect something like
>> '172.29.30.1:5432 ...").
>
> I already suspected this. The same goes for using the actual docker
> container ip, which is 172.29.29.107 on all 3 nodes. I think the best
> solution would be to introduce a bind_address configuration parameter,
> which defaults to hostnameN, but can be overridden. I guess the same
> thing goes for heartbeat_hostnameN.
Yeah, I thought the same. I will discuss with other developers next
year.
>> Since most pgpool developers are off for New Year's holiday, I will
>> discuss them next week.
>
> No need to hurry. 4.6.5 is working fine for us at the moment. I wish
> you a happy new year in advance.
Thanks.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nadav Shatz | 2026-01-08 07:46:26 | pgpool2_on_k8s repo status |
| Previous Message | Emond Papegaaij | 2025-12-31 06:57:51 | Re: Pgpool-II 4.7.0 released. |