| From: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: How can end users know the cause of LR slot sync delays? |
| Date: | 2025-12-04 12:29:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20251204122942.GF13635@p46.dedyn.io;lightning.p46.dedyn.io |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 12:06:44PM +0530, Shlok Kyal wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 at 08:54, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:59 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 3:37 PM Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 03:30:48PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > > > I suggested the current one because having the last was making the
> > > > > column name bit longer, and anyway the description clarifies it, but I
> > > > > see your point. So, the other options could be
> > > > > slotsync_last_skip_time, sync_last_skip_time, last_slotsync_skip_time,
> > > > > last_sync_skip_time .
> > > >
> > > > I also noticed while going through src/backend/catalog/system_views.sql
> > > > that *_last_*_time is rare, so in terms of brevity, removing the _time
> > > > at the end would be ok. "last_" already conveys time/a timestamp.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think it depends on case to case but having last in the similar
> > > cases seems to be a common practice. So, again thinking about it based
> > > on your suggestion and looking at existing fields, I suggest we should
> > > rename slotsync_skip_at to slotsync_last_skip. This is similar to
> > > checksum_last_failure. I think there is a value in keeping initials
> > > the same for similar fields in the view as users could easily identify
> > > the related columns while querying the view. For example,
> > > checksum_failures and checksum_last_failure in pg_stat_database.
> > >
> > > Anyone else have any opinion on the names proposed here?
> >
> > IMHO keeping it 'slotsync_last_skip' makes more sense, so that we can
> > keep the *slotsync* prefix and the naming style also match with some
> > other usage e.g. 'checksum_last_failure' as well. I see there are
> > more common examples where the name starts with 'last_' but I prefer
> > the 'slotsync_last_skip' name.
>
> I also agree with Amit and Dilip. I have made the change and attached
> the patch for the same.
LGTM.
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bilal Yavuz | 2025-12-04 12:33:30 | Re: Improve error reporting in 027_stream_regress test |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-12-04 12:19:07 | Remove unnecessary casts in printf format arguments |