Re: [PATCH] Expose checkpoint timestamp and duration in pg_stat_checkpointer

From: Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Soumya S Murali <soumyamurali(dot)work(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Expose checkpoint timestamp and duration in pg_stat_checkpointer
Date: 2025-11-26 17:41:39
Message-ID: 20251126174138.GE8364@p46.dedyn.io;lightning.p46.dedyn.io
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 06:23:08PM +0100, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
> El mié, 26 nov 2025, 11:14, Soumya S Murali <soumyamurali(dot)work(at)gmail(dot)com>
> escribió:
> There is a "Checkpoints" section in the pgbadger reports, and that's
> probably the most widely used tool.

That one parses the Postgres logs, so is unaffected by the changes to
pg_stat_checkpointer discussed here.

Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-11-26 18:25:57 Re: Partial hash index is not used for implied qual.
Previous Message Kirill Reshke 2025-11-26 17:37:39 Re: Allow GUC settings in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION to take effect