Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2025-11-24 17:49:47
Message-ID: 202511241747.ftgal46yiriw@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Nov-22, Mihail Nikalayeu wrote:

> 2) some updates for 0001 test stability (related to [0]).

This patch would bring the committed test file up to date with what you
last submitted. However, I didn't understand what is the problem with
the original formulation, and I haven't seen the test fail ... can you
explain?

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"El número de instalaciones de UNIX se ha elevado a 10,
y se espera que este número aumente" (UPM, 1972)

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Improve-test-case-stability.patch.txt text/plain 9.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-11-24 18:26:03 Re: get rid of Pointer type, mostly
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-11-24 17:41:21 Re: Missing wait events (gap analysis)