| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bryan Green <dbryan(dot)green(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Ryo Matsumura <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Buf fix: update-po for PGXS does not work |
| Date: | 2025-10-16 18:34:58 |
| Message-ID: | 202510161831.oaf75pvqrhak@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Oct-10, Bryan Green wrote:
> I took a look at the v2 patch for the PGXS update-po bug, and it looks solid.
Many thanks for the dedication to testing it! I have pushed this now to
all branches, though I'm unsure if Matsumura-san still needs it.
Regards
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Doing what he did amounts to sticking his fingers under the hood of the
implementation; if he gets his fingers burnt, it's his problem." (Tom Lane)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitrios Apostolou | 2025-10-16 18:59:05 | Re: [PING] [PATCH v2] parallel pg_restore: avoid disk seeks when jumping short distance forward |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-10-16 18:32:03 | Re: Question about InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot() |