Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: ojford(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org, li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com, krasiyan(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org, andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk, david(at)fetter(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options
Date: 2025-10-05 16:20:30
Message-ID: 202510051612.gw67jlc2iqpw@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Oct-03, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:

> I have just pushed the patch (plus patches for syntax.sgml and
> sql_features.txt. They were missued after I splitted the patch).
> Thank you for your effort!

I just noticed this compiler warning in a CI run,

[16:06:29.920] ../src/backend/executor/nodeWindowAgg.c:3820:16: warning: ‘datum’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
[16:06:29.920] 3820 | return datum;
[16:06:29.920] | ^~~~~
[16:06:29.920] ../src/backend/executor/nodeWindowAgg.c:3719:25: note: ‘datum’ was declared here
[16:06:29.920] 3719 | Datum datum;
[16:06:29.920] | ^~~~~

The logic in this function looks somewhat wicked.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-10-05 16:35:46 Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-10-05 16:05:01 Re: Fix misuse use of window_gettupleslot function (src/backend/executor/nodeWindowAgg.c)