Re: Having postgresql.org link to cgit instead of gitweb

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Having postgresql.org link to cgit instead of gitweb
Date: 2025-09-22 15:27:46
Message-ID: 202509221524.dalen7wjv4iv@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Sep-22, Tom Lane wrote:

> My first thought about scheduling was "best not in the middle of the
> 18.0 release cycle". However, I don't know of any actual connection
> between gitweb/cgit and the release-making tasks. My second thought
> was "the point here is to cut server load, and maybe we need that to
> happen before the anticipated traffic spike on Thursday". There
> might not be any connection there either, but if there is, agreed
> to get it done sooner not later.

I think the traffic overloads are mostly caused by LLM scrapers, which
as far as I know does not correlate with spikes caused by human behavior
or even those caused by mirroring traffic during a new release or such.

I would rather wait until next week, just in case something breaks.

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"This is what I like so much about PostgreSQL. Most of the surprises
are of the "oh wow! That's cool" Not the "oh shit!" kind. :)"
Scott Marlowe, http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2008-10/msg00152.php

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2025-09-22 15:38:55 Re: Having postgresql.org link to cgit instead of gitweb
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2025-09-22 15:26:28 Re: Use WALReadFromBuffers in more places