| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | nadav(at)tailorbrands(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgpool-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: recent access based routing for primary-replica setups |
| Date: | 2025-08-20 12:45:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20250820.214537.1156323467943836247.ishii@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgpool-hackers |
Hi Nadav,
Thank you for the answer.
I think your proposal actually includes two orthogonal proposals.
(1) "inject" replication delay value from external source (in your
case from Aurora).
(2) per relation recent access based routing.
I suggest to implement (1) first, then (2). This incremental approach
would be easier than implementing (1)+(2) at once.
For (1) we could add new pgpool.conf parameter, say
"replication_delay_source". If it is set to "builtin", then
replication delay source is PostgreSQL as we already does today. If
it's set other than "builtin", then it's an external command name (+
arguments) to be executed to import replication delay value. The
command should return replication delay value represented in strings
like "0 20 10", which means node 0, 1 and 2 replication delay values
in millisecond (in this case since the node 0 is primary, its
replication delay is 0). The command will be invoked every
sr_check_period.
I am not sure if this actually works in Aurora. This is just a quick
idea.
(2) would be probably much harder than (1). So we need more discussion
later on.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nadav Shatz | 2025-08-20 14:27:06 | Re: Proposal: recent access based routing for primary-replica setups |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2025-08-20 06:16:46 | Enhance watchdog_setup |