Re: BackgroundPsql swallowing errors on windows

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BackgroundPsql swallowing errors on windows
Date: 2025-08-16 17:59:03
Message-ID: 20250816175903.ca.nmisch@google.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 03:07:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 10:23:55AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> >> Yep. I put the tree in the necessary state, and [...]
>
> > https://metacpan.org/dist/IPC-Run is now a fresh release, and
> > https://ports.macports.org/search/?q=ipc-run&name=on shows that version.
>
> That's great news, but apparently there is some lag in new packages
> actually becoming available for download:
>
> $ sudo port selfupdate
> ---> Checking for newer releases of MacPorts
> MacPorts base version 2.11.4 installed,
> MacPorts base version 2.11.4 available.
> ---> MacPorts base is already the latest version
> ---> Updating the ports tree
>
> The ports tree has been updated.
> All installed ports are up to date.
> $ port installed | grep ipc
> p5.34-ipc-run @20231003.0.0_0 (active)

Hmm. I've never used MacPorts, so I'll probably not be an informed
commentator on its release flow. If relevant (probably not):
https://ports.macports.org/port/p5.34-ipc-run/details/ does show missing "Port
Health" for Sequoia (x86_64), Sonoma (arm64), and Sonoma (x86_64). Meanwhile,
https://ports.macports.org/port/p5.34-ipc-run/builds/ shows all builds of this
version happening in a <10min span, with no failures. If there's some "port"
command mode to force an install from source, that might bypass the blockage.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-08-16 19:13:28 Re: BackgroundPsql swallowing errors on windows
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-08-16 17:29:31 Re: About Custom Aggregates, C Extensions and Memory