Re: Retail DDL

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Ziga <ziga(at)ljudmila(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Retail DDL
Date: 2025-08-16 12:52:30
Message-ID: 202508161252.ymawbaq3ia6p@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Aug-16, Kirill Reshke wrote:

> After putting some more thought into it, maybe we can implement the
> whole thing as contrib extension? This would be the most Postgres-y
> way to me.

If we do that, then core tools such as psql or pg_dump can never depend
on them. -1 from me.

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Always assume the user will do much worse than the stupidest thing
you can imagine." (Julien PUYDT)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-08-16 12:59:42 Re: Retail DDL
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-08-16 12:24:29 Re: Compilation issues for HASH_STATISTICS and HASH_DEBUG options