From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com" <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18988: DROP SUBSCRIPTION locks not-yet-accessed database |
Date: | 2025-08-04 12:50:34 |
Message-ID: | 202508041250.6qjjfgnqe7mi@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 2025-Aug-04, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> I have worked on this and produced a first version of patch, let's see
> what others think about this idea. It would have been better if we
> could use SysCache for rechecking the subscription, but since we are
> not connected to the database in the launcher we can not use the
> SysCache, at least that's what I think.
I think it's reasonable to recheck after locking. There's a comment in
DropSubscription that says we get AEL, which is no longer true. In
is_subscription_exists() you should use the index on OID instead of
seqscanning the catalog without a scankey; also I think the name ought
to be "does" rather than "is". I think it's really odd that that
function opens and closes a transaction; sounds to me that something
like that really belongs in the caller (frankly the same is true with
the other function that your comment references). Why isn't
systable_beginscan being used to scan the catalog?
I think with this coding, the resource owner for this new lock is NULL.
Is this really a good approach? Maybe there should be a resowner here.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Always assume the user will do much worse than the stupidest thing
you can imagine." (Julien PUYDT)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Xuneng Zhou | 2025-08-04 13:13:47 | Re: BUG #19006: Assert(BufferIsPinned) in BufferGetBlockNumber() is triggered for forwarded buffer |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2025-08-04 12:28:11 | Re: BUG #18988: DROP SUBSCRIPTION locks not-yet-accessed database |