Re: Log prefix missing for subscriber log messages received from publisher

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Log prefix missing for subscriber log messages received from publisher
Date: 2025-07-17 16:15:51
Message-ID: 202507171615.3uafckrnbssa@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Jul-18, Fujii Masao wrote:

> The current patches add nearly identical notice_receiver functions
> in multiple places such as libpqwalreceiver.c and elsewhere. To avoid
> duplicating the same logic, could we define a shared notice receiver
> function in a common file, like libpq-be-fe-helpers.h, and use it in
> all three locations?

I like the idea of reducing duplication. I don't like the "prefix"
as proposed though, because it's not going to work well for translation
(string building) -- I'd rather pass the entire phrase from caller, so
that the translator has one piece to translate which lives in the module
that emits it. I think I'd do something like

ereport(LOG,
errmsg_internal("%s: %.*s",
_(prefix), len, message));

and see to it that each caller uses gettext_noop() around the string
they pass as "arg", for gettext to collect.

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2025-07-17 16:21:56 Re: PostgreSQL 16 bug feedback
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2025-07-17 16:09:08 Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall