| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
| Cc: | Arseniy Mukhin <arseniy(dot)mukhin(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: amcheck support for BRIN indexes |
| Date: | 2025-07-07 12:21:14 |
| Message-ID: | 202507071221.am6rbd6n4dct@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Jul-07, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Alvaro, what's your opinion on the introduction of the new WITHIN_RANGE?
> I'd probably try to do this using the regular consistent function:
>
> (a) we don't need to add stuff to all BRIN opclasses to support this
>
> (b) it gives us additional testing of the consistent function
>
> (c) building a scan key for equality seems pretty trivial
>
> What do you think?
Oh yeah, if we can build this on top of the existing primitives, then
I'm all for that.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jakub Wartak | 2025-07-07 12:31:28 | Re: Adding basic NUMA awareness |
| Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-07-07 12:18:20 | Re: Inconsistent LSN format in pg_waldump output |