Re: A concurrent VACUUM FULL?

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Erik Nordström <erik(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A concurrent VACUUM FULL?
Date: 2025-06-30 11:46:18
Message-ID: 202506301146.zotpzfyyxncq@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Jun-30, Erik Nordström wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 12:03 PM Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:

> > Patch [1] is in the queue that allows both reads and writes. (An exclusive
> > lock is acquired here for the swaps, but that should be held for very short
> > time.)
>
> That sounds great. Do you know if there's anything I can do to help?

It would be very valuable if you can review the code, test it under the
weirdest conditions you can imagine or just under normal conditions,
proof-read the documentation, try to see if anything is missing that
should be there, and so on. Everything that you would expect from a new
feature released as part of the next Postgres release. Any
problems/crashes/ abnormalities that you report before the patch is
included in Postgres, is one less issue that we'll have to deal with
after the release.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"El miedo atento y previsor es la madre de la seguridad" (E. Burke)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-06-30 11:46:54 Re: Report replica identity in pg_publication_tables
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2025-06-30 11:45:49 Re: track generic and custom plans in pg_stat_statements