Re: PG18 protocol version

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG18 protocol version
Date: 2025-06-26 11:34:14
Message-ID: 20250626.203414.57066734655686145.ishii@postgresql.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I didn't? I replaced it with a more generic version of the same
> information, that covers both protocol version 3.0 and 3.2 (and any
> future 3.x)

I meant this.
>> - (0 for the protocol described here).

With your patch the explanation that this document (Message Formats)
is for 3.2, is gone. But maybe it's okay since "54.1.4. Protocol
versions" already stats that the whole F/B protocol docs is for 3.2.

What do you think?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jakub Wartak 2025-06-26 11:36:47 Re: NUMA shared memory interleaving
Previous Message Jakub Wartak 2025-06-26 11:31:39 Re: NUMA shared memory interleaving