From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | myon(at)debian(dot)org |
Cc: | michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, daniel(at)yesql(dot)se, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, devops(at)ww-it(dot)cn, ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org, qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, tony(dot)zhu(at)ww-it(dot)cn |
Subject: | Re: Retiring some encodings? |
Date: | 2025-06-05 23:50:56 |
Message-ID: | 20250606.085056.525174573937784302.ishii@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> Agreed that the so-said "state" level requirement would be a
>> non-starter.
>
> Or maybe support for using these as server encodings could be
> removed, keeping the client_encoding part intact?
GB18030 is already client encoding only, and cannot be used as a
server encoding. The only way to save GB18030 data into database is,
converting GB18030 to UTF-8 (which can be done automatically).
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2025-06-05 23:53:40 | We should lazy-initialize the deadlock checker state memory |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-06-05 23:31:51 | Re: Non-reproducible AIO failure |