Re: Retiring some encodings?

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz
Cc: daniel(at)yesql(dot)se, qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Retiring some encodings?
Date: 2025-05-24 02:23:23
Message-ID: 20250524.112323.1822848562776799466.ishii@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Yeah, that's a good point. I would also question what's the benefit
> in using GB18030 over UTF-8, though. An obvious one I can see is
> because legacy applications never get updated.

Plus users have too many GB18030 encoded files, I guess.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florents Tselai 2025-05-24 02:54:57 Re: mention unused_oids script in pg_proc.dat
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-05-24 01:42:34 Re: queryId constant squashing does not support prepared statements