Re: alphabetize long options in pg_dump[all] docs

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com
Subject: Re: alphabetize long options in pg_dump[all] docs
Date: 2025-04-30 14:46:37
Message-ID: 202504301446.a5ytr5imh5el@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Apr-30, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On 29.04.25 23:54, Nathan Bossart wrote:

> > Fair point. We seem to be pivoting towards long options, anyway. If
> > there's support for this, I could go through all the client and server
> > application docs to ensure they match this style.
>
> However, I think this would require coordination across all --help output
> and man pages (76 objects), so for the short term, let's just move recently
> added options to the right place under the current theory/theories, and
> leave a larger reshuffling for later.

+1 WFM

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Pero la cosa no es muy grave ..." (le petit Nicolas -- René Goscinny)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yura Sokolov 2025-04-30 14:55:43 Re: [RFC] Lock-free XLog Reservation from WAL
Previous Message Junwang Zhao 2025-04-30 14:07:36 Re: Introduce some randomness to autovacuum