Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects
Date: 2024-04-24 21:08:39
Message-ID: 20240424210839.GA863220@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:47:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> On the whole I find this proposed feature pretty unexciting
> and dubiously worthy of the implementation/maintenance effort.

I don't have any particularly strong feelings on $SUBJECT, but I'll admit
I'd be much more interested in resolving any remaining reasons folks are
using large objects over TOAST. I see a couple of reasons listed in the
docs [0] that might be worth examining.

[0] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/lo-intro.html

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2024-04-24 22:36:35 Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Previous Message Noah Misch 2024-04-24 21:03:19 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum