Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
Date: 2024-03-15 01:52:55
Message-ID: 20240315015255.GA3248600@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 04:00:10PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Separately, I suppose it's probably time to revert the temporary debugging
> code adding by commit 5ddf997. I can craft a patch for that, too.

As promised...

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Revert-Temporary-patch-to-help-debug-pg_walsummar.patch text/x-diff 3.0 KB
v1-0002-Fix-possible-overflow-in-MaybeRemoveOldWalSummari.patch text/x-diff 1.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2024-03-15 02:21:02 Re: Add bump memory context type and use it for tuplesorts
Previous Message James Coleman 2024-03-15 01:06:54 Re: [DOCS] HOT - correct claim about indexes not referencing old line pointers