Re: Popcount optimization using AVX512

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: "Amonson, Paul D" <paul(dot)d(dot)amonson(at)intel(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Shankaran, Akash" <akash(dot)shankaran(at)intel(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Popcount optimization using AVX512
Date: 2024-03-07 17:59:55
Message-ID: 20240307175955.GA502899@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 06:53:12PM +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Really, I don't think this is very important as a review point, because
> if the file is changed in the patch, it's best for the
> committer to run autoconf on their own, using a pristine GNU autoconf;
> the configure file in the submitted patch is not relevant, only
> matters.

Agreed. I didn't intend for this to be a major review point, and I
apologize for the extra noise.

Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services:

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-03-07 18:10:53 Re: improve ssl error code, 2147483650
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-03-07 17:56:46 Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?