Re: Popcount optimization using AVX512

Thanks for the new version of the patch. I didn't see a commitfest entry
for this one, and unfortunately I think it's too late to add it for the
March commitfest. I would encourage you to add it to July's commitfest [0]
so that we can get some routine cfbot coverage.

On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 08:46:06PM +0000, Amonson, Paul D wrote:
> After consulting some Intel internal experts on MSVC the linking issue as
> it stood was not resolved. Instead, I created a MSVC ONLY work-around.
> This adds one extra functional call on the Windows builds (The linker
> resolves a real function just fine but not a function pointer of the same
> name). This extra latency does not exist on any of the other platforms. I
> also believe I addressed all issues raised in the previous reviews. The
> new pg_popcnt_x86_64_accel.c file is now the ONLY file compiled with the
> AVX512 compiler flags. I added support for the MSVC compiler flag as
> well. Both meson and autoconf are updated with the new refactor.
>
> I am attaching the new patch.

I think this patch might be missing the new files.

-#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))

IME this means that the autoconf you are using has been patched. A quick
search on the mailing lists seems to indicate that it might be specific to
Debian [1].

-static int pg_popcount32_slow(uint32 word);
-static int pg_popcount64_slow(uint64 word);
+int pg_popcount32_slow(uint32 word);
+int pg_popcount64_slow(uint64 word);
+uint64 pg_popcount_slow(const char *buf, int bytes);

This patch appears to do a lot of refactoring. Would it be possible to
break out the refactoring parts into a prerequisite patch that could be
reviewed and committed independently from the AVX512 stuff?

-#if SIZEOF_VOID_P >= 8
+#if SIZEOF_VOID_P == 8
/* Process in 64-bit chunks if the buffer is aligned. */
- if (buf == (const char *) TYPEALIGN(8, buf))
+ if (buf == (const char *)TYPEALIGN(8, buf))
{
- const uint64 *words = (const uint64 *) buf;
+ const uint64 *words = (const uint64 *)buf;

while (bytes >= 8)
{
@@ -309,9 +213,9 @@ pg_popcount(const char *buf, int bytes)
bytes -= 8;
}

- buf = (const char *) words;
+ buf = (const char *)words;
}
-#else
+#elif SIZEOF_VOID_P == 4
/* Process in 32-bit chunks if the buffer is aligned. */
if (buf == (const char *) TYPEALIGN(4, buf))
{

Most, if not all, of these changes seem extraneous. Do we actually need to
more strictly check SIZEOF_VOID_P?

[0] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/
[1] https://postgr.es/m/20230211020042.uthdgj72kp3xlqam%40awork3.anarazel.de

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com