| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RangeTblEntry.inh vs. RTE_SUBQUERY |
| Date: | 2024-02-29 19:07:20 |
| Message-ID: | 202402291907.e6ax6kfnktt4@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-Feb-29, Tom Lane wrote:
> I agree that perminfoindex seems to have suffered from add-at-the-end
> syndrome, and if we do touch the field order you made an improvement
> there. (BTW, who thought they needn't bother with a comment for
> perminfoindex?)
There is a comment for it, or at least a61b1f74823c added one, though
not immediately adjacent. I do see that it's now further away than it
was. Perhaps we could add /* index of RTEPermissionInfo entry, or 0 */
to the line.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"The ability of users to misuse tools is, of course, legendary" (David Steele)
https://postgr.es/m/11b38a96-6ded-4668-b772-40f992132797@pgmasters.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Phil Florent | 2024-02-29 19:12:02 | RE: Remove AIX Support (was: Re: Relation bulk write facility) |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2024-02-29 19:06:22 | Re: Comments on Custom RMGRs |