Re: scram_iterations is undocumented GUC_REPORT

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: scram_iterations is undocumented GUC_REPORT
Date: 2024-01-30 14:44:36
Message-ID: 202401301444.3daiezts3c3n@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024-Jan-30, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:

> On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 13:37, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > I noticed while answering a question that commit b577743000cd added the
> > GUC scram_iterations and marked it GUC_REPORT, but failed to add it to
> > the PQparameterStatus documentation.
>
> +1 the improvements your suggesting (although 3 I don't know enough
> about to be sure)
>
> One important note though is that this list is tracked in two
> different places, so both of these places should be updated:
> - doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml
> - doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml

Ooh, you're right. I propose to turn the list into a
<simplelist type="vert" columns="2">
which looks _much_ nicer to read, as in the attached screenshot of the
PDF.

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
<inflex> really, I see PHP as like a strange amalgamation of C, Perl, Shell
<crab> inflex: you know that "amalgam" means "mixture with mercury",
more or less, right?
<crab> i.e., "deadly poison"

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Update-PQparameterStatus-and-ParameterStatus-docs.patch text/x-diff 5.9 KB
image/png 54.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2024-01-30 14:50:10 Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-01-30 14:36:06 Re: scram_iterations is undocumented GUC_REPORT