Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Denis Laxalde <denis(dot)laxalde(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jelte Fennema <Jelte(dot)Fennema(at)microsoft(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel
Date: 2024-01-26 12:11:02
Message-ID: 202401261211.r7kf6dik7y34@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pushed 0001.

I wonder, would it make sense to put all these new functions in a
separate file fe-cancel.c?

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"World domination is proceeding according to plan" (Andrew Morton)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2024-01-26 12:20:05 Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2024-01-26 12:02:12 Re: Finding every use of a built-in function