Re: core dumps in auto_prewarm, tests succeed

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Nathan Bossart <nathan(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: core dumps in auto_prewarm, tests succeed
Date: 2024-01-23 17:33:25
Message-ID: 202401231733.rnelf7hcjqoz@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024-Jan-22, Nathan Bossart wrote:

> Here is a patch.

Looks reasonable.

> This might be a topic for another thread, but I do wonder whether we could
> put a generic pg_controldata check in node->stop that would at least make
> sure that the state is some sort of expected shut-down state. My first
> thought is that it could be a tad expensive, but... maybe it wouldn't be
> too bad.

Does this actually detect a problem if you take out the fix? I think
what's going to happen is that postmaster is going to crash, then do the
recovery cycle, then stop as instructed by the test; so pg_controldata
would report that it was correctly shut down.

If we had a restart-cycle-counter to check maybe we could verify that it
hasn't changed, but I don't think we have that.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Cada quien es cada cual y baja las escaleras como quiere" (JMSerrat)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2024-01-23 17:43:25 Re: index prefetching
Previous Message Andres Freund 2024-01-23 17:30:05 Re: core dumps in auto_prewarm, tests succeed