From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | andres(at)anarazel(dot)de |
Cc: | michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Network failure may prevent promotion |
Date: | 2024-01-23 04:23:20 |
Message-ID: | 20240123.132320.1131416933172930185.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Mon, 22 Jan 2024 13:29:10 -0800, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote in
> Hi,
>
> On 2024-01-19 12:28:05 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 03:42:28PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > > Given that commit 728f86fec6 that introduced this issue was not strictly
> > > required, perhaps we should just revert it for v16.
> >
> > Is there a point in keeping 728f86fec6 as well on HEAD? That does not
> > strike me as wise to keep that in the tree for now. If it needs to be
> > reworked, looking at this problem from scratch would be a safer
> > approach.
>
> IDK, I think we'll introduce this type of bug over and over if we don't fix it
> properly.
Just to clarify my position, I thought that 728f86fec6 was heading the
right direction. Considering the current approach to signal handling
in walreceiver, I believed that it would be better to further
generalize in this direction rather than reverting. That's why I
proposed that patch.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-01-23 04:41:25 | Re: psql: Allow editing query results with \gedit |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2024-01-23 04:15:21 | Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation |