Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2023-12-21 11:27:41
Message-ID: 20231221112741.c2jcx5neryyqpzzw@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2023-12-21 14:41:37 +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> I've attached v47, which is v46 plus some fixes for radix tree.

Could either of you summarize what the design changes you've made in the last
months are and why you've done them? Unfortunately this thread is very long,
and the comments in the file just say "FIXME" in places that apparently are
affected by design changes. This makes it hard to catch up here.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-12-21 11:37:46 Re: Detecting some cases of missing backup_label
Previous Message Andrey M. Borodin 2023-12-21 11:26:43 Re: Autonomous transactions 2023, WIP