On 2023-12-08 17:29:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> >> I think I figured it it out. Looks like we need to translate a closed socket
> >> (recvfrom() returning 0) to ECONNRESET or such.
>
> > Seems like we should just treat errno == 0 as a reason to emit the "EOF
> > detected" message?
>
> Agreed. I think we want to do that after the initial handshake,
> too, so maybe as attached.
I was wondering about that too. But if we do so, why not also do it for
writes?