| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: about help message for new pg_dump's --filter option |
| Date: | 2023-12-02 16:02:47 |
| Message-ID: | 202312021602.wcyxtz5db2oi@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-Nov-30, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Recently, a new --filter option was added to pg_dump. I might be
> wrong, but the syntax of the help message for this feels off. Is the
> word 'on' not necessary after 'based'?
>
> > --filter=FILENAME include or exclude objects and data from dump
> > based expressions in FILENAME
Isn't this a bit too long? Maybe we can do something shorter, like
--filter=FILENAME determine objects in dump based on FILENAME
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Those who use electric razors are infidels destined to burn in hell while
we drink from rivers of beer, download free vids and mingle with naked
well shaved babes." (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=44793&cid=4647152)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shlok Kyal | 2023-12-02 16:22:02 | Re: undetected deadlock in ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-12-02 15:11:20 | Re: Emitting JSON to file using COPY TO |