Re: CRC32C Parallel Computation Optimization on ARM

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Xiang Gao <Xiang(dot)Gao(at)arm(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CRC32C Parallel Computation Optimization on ARM
Date: 2023-11-06 19:16:13
Message-ID: 20231106191613.GA524892@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 10:46:57AM +0000, Xiang Gao wrote:
> On Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 09:35:50AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> The idea is that we don't want to start forcing runtime checks on builds
>> where we aren't already doing runtime checks. IOW if the compiler can use
>> the ARMv8 CRC instructions with the default compiler flags, we should only
>> use vmull_p64() if it can also be used with the default compiler flags.
>
> This is the newest patch, I think the code for which crc algorithm to
> choose is a bit complicated. Maybe we can just use USE_ARMV8_VMULL only,
> and do runtime checks on the vmull_p64 instruction at all times. This
> will not affect the existing builds, because this is a new instruction
> and new logic. In addition, it can also reduce the complexity of the
> code.

I don't think we can. AFAICT a runtime check necessitates a function
pointer or a branch, both of which incurred an impact on performance in my
tests. It looks like this latest patch still does the runtime check even
for the USE_ARMV8_CRC32C case.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2023-11-06 19:28:14 Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2023-11-06 18:54:49 Re: Add bump memory context type and use it for tuplesorts