From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ronan Dunklau <ronan(dot)dunklau(at)aiven(dot)io>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers) |
Date: | 2023-10-18 18:11:32 |
Message-ID: | 20231018181132.vux4gg3guv33lgaf@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-10-19 06:20:26 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 1:06 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 12:02 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > I pushed the first patch, for LLVM 16, and the build farm told me that
> > > some old LLVM versions don't like it. The problem seems to be the
> > > function LLVMGlobalGetValueType(). I can see that that was only added
> > > to the C API in 2018, so it looks like I may need to back-port that
> > > (trivial) wrapper into our own llvmjit_wrap.cpp for LLVM < 8.
> >
> > Concretely something like the attached should probably fix it, but
> > it'll take me a little while to confirm that...
>
> Pushed, after digging up some old LLVM skeletons to test, and those
> "old LLVM" animals are turning green now. I went ahead and pushed the
> much smaller and simpler patch for LLVM 17.
I enabled a new set of buildfarm animals to test LLVM 16 and 17. I initially
forgot to disable them for 11, which means we'll have those failed build on 11
until they age out :/.
Particularly for the LLVM debug builds it'll take a fair bit to run on all
branches. Each branch takes about 3h.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim Gündüz | 2023-10-18 18:38:09 | Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers) |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2023-10-18 17:20:26 | Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers) |