Re: Adding a pg_get_owned_sequence function?

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding a pg_get_owned_sequence function?
Date: 2023-09-01 17:55:37
Message-ID: 20230901175537.GB3180181@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 01:31:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I wonder if it'd be possible to just remove pg_get_serial_sequence().
>
> A quick search at http://codesearch.debian.net/ finds uses of it
> in packages like gdal, qgis, rails, ... We could maybe get rid of
> it after a suitable deprecation period, but I think we can't just
> summarily remove it.

Given that, I'd still vote for marking it deprecated, but I don't feel
strongly about actually removing it anytime soon (or anytime at all,
really).

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2023-09-01 17:55:52 Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-09-01 17:52:29 Re: GenBKI emits useless open;close for catalogs without rows