Re: Make psql's qeury canceling test simple by using signal() routine of IPC::Run

From: Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Make psql's qeury canceling test simple by using signal() routine of IPC::Run
Date: 2023-08-14 14:37:25
Message-ID: 20230814233725.719aca630465150ba615d24b@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 08:29:25 +0900
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 11:22:33AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > Test run is ok on my Ubuntu laptop.
>
> I have a few comments about this patch.
>
> On HEAD and even after this patch, we still have the following:
> SKIP: { skip "cancel test requires a Unix shell", 2 if $windows_os;
>
> Could the SKIP be removed for $windows_os? If not, this had better be
> documented because the reason for the skip becomes incorrect.
>
> The comment at the top of the SKIP block still states the following:
> # There is, as of this writing, no documented way to get the PID of
> # the process from IPC::Run. As a workaround, we have psql print its
> # own PID (which is the parent of the shell launched by psql) to a
> # file.
>
> This is also incorrect.

Thank you for your comments

I will check whether the test works in Windows and remove SKIP if possible.
Also, I'll fix the comment in either case.

Regards,
Yugo Nagata

--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2023-08-14 14:37:34 Re: AssertLog instead of Assert in some places
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2023-08-14 14:36:42 Re: [RFC] Add jit deform_counter