Re: Using defines for protocol characters

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Date: 2023-08-08 06:27:40
Message-ID: 20230808062740.uvljfvr3sy7g7ulf@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023-Aug-07, Nathan Bossart wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 04:02:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> >> Can we vote or whatever it takes to decide on a naming pattern that is
> >> acceptable ?
> >
> > I'm good with Robert's proposal above.
>
> +1

WFM as well.

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Every machine is a smoke machine if you operate it wrong enough."
https://twitter.com/libseybieda/status/1541673325781196801

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2023-08-08 06:38:25 Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2023-08-08 06:19:40 Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions