Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Brown <michael(dot)brown(at)discourse(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
Date: 2023-08-01 16:37:07
Message-ID: 20230801163707.GA862840@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 11:39:46AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I just realized I forgot to update the --help output for these utilities.
> I'll do that in the next version of the patch.

Done in v3. Sorry for the noise.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-allow-syncfs-in-frontend-utilities.patch text/x-diff 36.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2023-08-01 16:50:40 Re: How to build a new grammer for pg?
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2023-08-01 16:30:00 Re: New Table Access Methods for Multi and Single Inserts