Re: remaining sql/json patches

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: remaining sql/json patches
Date: 2023-07-10 14:51:58
Message-ID: 20230710145158.3eyoqmrbqluulee5@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I forgot to add:

* 0001 looks an obvious improvement. You could just push it now, to
avoid carrying it forward anymore. I would just put the constructName
ahead of value expr in the argument list, though.

* 0002: I have no idea what this is (though I probably should). I would
also push it right away -- if anything, so that we figure out sooner
that it was actually needed in the first place. Or maybe you just need
the right test cases?

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2023-07-10 14:55:06 Re: Add more sanity checks around callers of changeDependencyFor()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-07-10 14:51:24 Re: Add more sanity checks around callers of changeDependencyFor()