Re: Outdated description of PG_CACHE_LINE_SIZE

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Outdated description of PG_CACHE_LINE_SIZE
Date: 2023-07-03 09:24:23
Message-ID: 20230703092423.gkwurhnezd3sznxv@jrouhaud
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 12:01:55PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 01/07/2023 10:49, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> >
> > I just noticed that the comment for PG_CACHE_LINE_SIZE still says that "it's
> > currently used in xlog.c", which hasn't been true for quite some time.
> >
> > PFA a naive patch to make the description more generic.
>
> Applied, thanks!

Thanks!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2023-07-03 09:40:58 Re: Should heapam_estimate_rel_size consider fillfactor?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-07-03 09:22:48 Re: patch: improve "user mapping not found" error message