Re: add \dpS to psq [16beta1]

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: add \dpS to psq [16beta1]
Date: 2023-06-29 04:38:58
Message-ID: 20230629043858.GA2049807@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 02:11:43AM +0000, Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP) wrote:
> I found while testing PostgreSQL 16 Beta 1 that the output of the \? metacommand did not include \dS, \dpS.
> The attached patch changes the output of the \? meta command to:

Thanks for the report! I've committed your patch.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2023-06-29 05:16:26 Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases
Previous Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2023-06-29 04:28:52 RE: pg_decode_message vs skip_empty_xacts and xact_wrote_changes