Re: cutting down the TODO list thread

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cutting down the TODO list thread
Date: 2023-05-16 08:50:45
Message-ID: 20230516085045.tugzp5w6kwenfv3k@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023-May-13, John Naylor wrote:

> --------------------
> 2. Propose to move to the "Not Wanted list":

> Consider having single-page pruning update the visibility map
> -> Comment from Heikki in the thread:
> "I think I was worried about the possible performance impact of having to
> clear the bit in visibility map again. If you're frequently updating a
> tuple so that HOT and page pruning is helping you, setting the bit in
> visibility map seems counter-productive; it's going to be cleared soon
> again by another UPDATE. That's just a hunch, though. Maybe the overhead
> is negligible."

Hmm, I agree with removing the entry from the TODO list, but why is this
something we Do Not Want? If somebody shows up and do some analysis
that in a certain workload it is beneficial to do this, then I don't
think we should turn them down.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-05-16 09:17:17 Re: pgsql: Clean up role created in new subscription test.
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-05-16 08:19:26 Re: Using make_ctags leaves tags files in git