Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Date: 2023-05-03 10:40:34
Message-ID: 20230503104034.bhi5tlxscx2wcqj3@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023-May-02, Julien Rouhaud wrote:

> On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 12:55:18PM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > A point on preserving physical replication slots: because we change WAL
> > format from one major version to the next (adding new messages or
> > changing format for other messages), we can't currently rely on physical
> > slots working across different major versions.
>
> I don't think anyone suggested to do physical replication over different major
> versions.

They didn't, but a man can dream. (Anyway, we agree on it not working
for various reasons.)

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"No es bueno caminar con un hombre muerto"

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-05-03 12:16:54 Re: Add two missing tests in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-05-03 10:29:25 Re: Add two missing tests in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl