Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org, andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, david(at)fetter(dot)org, ojford(at)gmail(dot)com, krasiyan(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options
Date: 2023-04-23 03:29:24
Message-ID: 20230423.122924.1057178185198391182.t-ishii@sranhm.sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> writes:
>> On 4/22/23 14:14, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>>> Note that RESPECT/IGNORE are not registered as reserved keywords in
>>> this patch (but registered as unreserved keywords). I am not sure if
>>> this is acceptable or not.
>
>> For me, this is perfectly okay. Keep them at the lowest level of
>> reservation as possible.
>
> Yeah, keep them unreserved if at all possible. Any higher reservation
> level risks breaking existing applications that might be using these
> words as column or function names.

Agreed.

Best reagards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS LLC
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2023-04-23 05:31:04 xmlserialize bug - extra empty row at the end
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2023-04-23 01:24:02 Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options