Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name
Date: 2023-04-20 23:32:43
Message-ID: 20230420233243.GB1437940@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:38:34AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> While here, I wonder if we should document what BGW_MAXLEN is defined as in
> bgworker.sgml?

I am -0.5 for this. If you are writing a new background worker, it's
probably reasonable to expect that you can locate the definition of
BGW_MAXLEN. Also, I think there's a good chance that we'd forget to update
such documentation the next time we adjust it.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2023-04-21 00:26:27 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-04-20 22:51:54 Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age?