Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Date: 2023-04-07 21:33:32
Message-ID: 20230407213332.l2upiiqtigmnqvf2@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I gave a very quick look at 0001 and 0003. I find no fault with 0001.
It was clear back when we added that stuff that invalidated_at was not
terribly useful -- I was just too conservative to not have it -- but now
that a lot of time has passed and we haven't done anything with it,
removing it seems perfectly OK.

As for 0003, I have no further concerns about the translatability.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"El miedo atento y previsor es la madre de la seguridad" (E. Burke)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yurii Rashkovskii 2023-04-07 21:33:42 Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-04-07 21:27:09 Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys